Governance, oversight, and defensible audit posture

ADA Title II is an accountability regime. In practice, that accountability shows up through audits and, potentially, lawsuits, both of which center on two questions: whether the organization is meeting accessibility requirements and whether it can demonstrate sustained, good-faith “best effort” activity over time.

Title2Ready supports that reality by establishing a centralized program structure: compliance monitoring and measuring, coordination of remediation activities through common workflows, visibility into digital asset status across teams, and persistent audit trails that document activity, decisions, and progress.

This transforms accessibility remediation from fragmented, silo’d efforts into a structured, organization-wide program that improves readiness before key deadlines and enables ongoing sustainment afterward.

Operational workflow and structured execution

At the execution level, Title2Ready bridges the gaps between subject matter expertise (for example, faculty who know the course content) and the technical requirements needed to make digital assets conformant. It does this through a guided, interactive interview workflow that translates easy-to-answer questions into structured remediation requirements, scope definition, and documentation.

Because no organization remediates everything at once, Title2Ready begins by supporting triage. The workflow helps teams identify what is in scope versus out of scope, then prioritize what matters most first. For example, a syllabus needed on day one carries different urgency and impact than an optional reading assigned late in the term. This triage step creates clarity and momentum, and it reduces the risk of spending effort on low-impact assets while high-impact assets lag behind.

From there, remediation becomes a standardized production workflow. Each course or content area is evaluated for its list of digital assets; each digital asset is then routed through a consistent remediation process that includes automated and manual steps. Every step is documented, progress is updated immediately, and activity is traceable at both the user and asset level.

This is where the heavy lifting happens for first-time remediation. It is the heart of the “update the digital asset” effort: disciplined execution, consistent documentation, and measurable completion.

End-user review, institution-specific scoring, and proof of outcome

Once remediation work is completed, teams still need a practical way to review results from the end-user experience perspective. Title2Ready provides that verification layer through Screen2Text (S2T), a proprietary tool that loads a digital asset and generates a text transcript approximating what a screen reader would announce when interpreting a web page. This gives content owners and remediation teams a straightforward “sanity check” that is easy to review and useful for quality control. (Screen2Text will later extend this same approach to PDFs.)

Compliance Improvement also includes a Title2Ready scoring rubric that organizations can tailor to their own definitions, goals, and risk tolerances. This supports consistent decision-making across teams and provides a common language for progress reporting, escalation, and exception handling.

Many organizations already use industry tools such as Ally as part of their accessibility efforts. Those tools can be helpful for technical indicators and broad accessibility support, but they are not a guarantee of WCAG conformance. Some checks are outside their scope, and some findings do not map cleanly to WCAG success criteria. Title2Ready is explicitly WCAG-centric and is designed to help teams validate results, document outcomes, and demonstrate best-effort activity in ways that stand up under audit or legal scrutiny.